Editor's Note

The FOI Advocate is a compendium of ideas, edited story excerpts and other materials from a variety of Web sites, as well as original concepts and analysis. When the information comes directly from another source, it will be attributed and a link will be provided whenever possible. The blog relies on the accuracy and integrity of the original sources cited. We will correct errors and inaccuracies when we become aware of them.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Missouri AG to Guv: E-mails are public records

LinkQuite a lively flap in the Show-Me State, where the governor rather cavalierly declared that he deletes his e-mail. The whole thing blew up after a column from my buddy Tony Messenger at the Springfield News-Leader questioned use of government e-mail use in a state Republican Party offensive over Planned Parenthood's lawsuit against the state.

The Missouri attorney general's office sent a message to media outlets Monday emphasizing that e-mails on the state system are public records and often should be preserved.

The office was reacting to reports that Gov. Matt Blunt's staff routinely purges e-mails and does not consider them public records.

James Klahr, the attorney general's lead lawyer on Missouri's open-records "Sunshine Law," sent the message to dismiss the "unnecessary debate" over the issue.

The message does not mention Blunt but declares, "There should be no debate — e-mail communications are public records."

And how about this amazing line?

Topics that are not typically hot-button election talk — the Sunshine Law and the protection of records — may emerge as key issues in the governor's race.

Klahr's message to newspapers and TV and radio stations says "we will be redoubling our education efforts to ensure members of the public and government officials" understand how the Sunshine Law applies to e-mails.

A spokesman for Nixon said the office will send media outlets copies of the law, which details the public's access to government documents and meetings.

State law gives the attorney general, local prosecutors and the public the power to sue over Sunshine Law violations. "Enforcement of violations of the record retention law depend on the nature and content of the e-mails or documents and the circumstances surrounding their destruction," said the spokesman, John Fougere.

Blunt's office on Monday declined to comment.

1 comment:

Christopher King said...

You better believe those emails are a public record.

But I'm going to have to sue for them in NH after State Rep. Martha McLeod tried to sneak HB 1428 honoring a rogue cop named Bruce McKay past the members of the community of Franconia, NH and local Reps.


They have a policy that only emails to committees are public, and that's just not right. Any email on that subject to or from a Statehouse email address is fair game.

Look at their policy in these thumbnails:


Time for litigation.