Vermont Considers Anonymity for HIgher Education Donations

The Vermont Senate cleared a bill to exempt certain donations to public higher education institutions from the state's public records law. Private donors who wish to remain anonymous could do so, although the amount and purpose of the donation would remain public. The identify of any donor who "transacts business" with the institution within three years of the donation would be public also.

The Vermont House will take up the bill this week.

For more information about the bill, click here.

Anonymous Donors & FOI: A Tough Issue

A nice look at a contentious issue:

With only so much taxpayer funds available to pay for a lengthy wish list of capital projects, the town is increasingly relying on the generosity of a wealthy citizenry to fund everything from a proposed Byram pool to improvements at the municipal golf course.

Some gifts have come with a catch, with the donors requesting their anonymity from the town. A number of elected officials acknowledge that the practice could raise questions about transparency and donors currying favors. Most say the benefits outweigh the risk with so many projects competing for funding and limited funds to go around, however.

"I think from my point of view there's a tremendous list of things that need to get done and we live in a community where there are so many generous citizens who are committed to making Greenwich better, and they deserve our gratitude and our respect," Selectman Lin Lavery said.

Lavery, who promised during her campaign to champion a new public swimming pool in Byram Park, received $100,000 in commitments from private donors for a site survey and for the project's initial design. The donors' names have been a tightly guarded secret by Lavery, an ardent supporter of public-private partnerships from her days as president of the nonprofit Junior League of Greenwich.

"For some people, they like anonymity because it protects them from excessive requests," said Lavery, who also doesn't want to release any names until the money is actually spent on the project. "So there's no point publicizing the donor who has made a commitment but has not yet made the donation."

Some in town government are discouraging the practice of withholding the names of donors and said it could set a bad precedent.

"My personal opinion is that it's preferred to know who the donor is, so there is no conflict of interest," said Pamela Frederick, chairman of the Representative Town Meeting's Finance Committee.

Frederick said she realized that in the nonprofit world it is customary to receive anonymous donations but feels it inappropriate for the town.

More here.

This is a tough, tough FOI issue...

I fear the legislative blowback from stuff like this...granted, there IS an issue about the location of the town center, but...

The donors of the $10 million gift to Mount Pleasant are a brother and sister who say they have no development ties, according to records.

Emil Ebe, 86, and Lorraine Ebe, 84, gave the donation to be used for the construction of public buildings in a new village complex. The contract was accepted by the village on March 10 and announced the same day at a board meeting. They signed the contract Feb. 29.

The Ebes requested anonymity for their donation. They revealed their names to The Journal Times in a letter after the newspaper filed a request March 17 to view the contract under the Wisconsin Public Records Law.

"We have made this donation to the Village of Mt. Pleasant with no expectation of anything in return from the Village of Mt. Pleasant. We are not now nor have we in the past been developers in the Village of Mt.Pleasant," they wrote in the March 18 letter. "It was our intent to provide the Village of Mt. Pleasant with a new Village Hall and other Village buildings.

The Ebes are not listed as owning any property in the county other than their residence, according to the Racine County Treasurer’s office. They have lived in Mount Pleasant since 1949.

More here.