FOI Case Asks Whether Petition Signatures are Public Records

The Shepherdstown Observer filed an appeal with the West Virginia Supreme Court over its FOI request for the more than 2,000 names of those who signed a zoning referendum petition.  A Jefferson County Circuit Court judge ruled against the paper, keeping the citizens names private.  The West Virginia Supreme Court has not yet said whether it will hear the paper's appeal.

Get more information here.

Judge temporarily blocks names of Ref. 71 signers

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order in response to a Protect Washington Families request to keep the names and addresses of those who signed Referendum 71 from the public, the Seattle Times reported. It will remain until the hearing set for Sept. 3. The Secretary of State Office admitted that it has no statutory authority to withhold the names but didn't pan to contest the TRO effort. However, U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle wrote that the group demonstrated "a reasonable likelihood of irreparable harm if the names are released."

Protect Marriage Washington submitted 138,500 signatures to get Referendum 71, which would repel a law giving gay couples marriage-like benefits, onto the November ballot.

A federal judge in Tacoma has temporarily blocked release of the names and addresses of those who signed Referendum 71, which would repeal a law giving gay couples new marriage-like benefits.

U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle this afternoon granted a temporary restraining order requested by Protect Washington Families to stop the Secretary of State's Office from making the signers' names public.

The TRO will remain in place until a hearing set for Sept. 3.

More here.

The Petition Clause Takes a Beating in Missouri

The people elected to make laws in Missouri are trying to make it more difficult for voters to make laws themselves.

The General Assembly’s quest to restrict ballot initiatives could cause a clash between the people’s constitutional rights and the legislature’s constitutional powers.

In addition to general free speech rights, the Missouri Constitution specifically states that people have the right to enact laws and constitutional amendments through initiatives, independent of the General Assembly.

Yet the legislature also has the power to prescribe the details of how that is done.

So on Feb. 28, the House voted 107-41 to pass legislation that would impose several new requirements on the people who gather petition signatures. The bill, H.B. 1763, would:

• Require petition circulators to be Missouri residents and U.S. citizens.
• Prohibit them from being paid based on the number of signatures they gather.
• Bar them from simultaneously collecting signatures for more than one initiative.
• Require them to register with the secretary of state’s office before they start collecting signatures rather than before the deadline to turn them in, as is currently the case.

The legislation now heads to the Senate, where a similar proposal already is pending on this week’s debate calendar.

More here.